Why Deciphering The Truth From Speculation In SEM/SEO Is Important
SEM General January 2nd. 2008, 12:37am
Whether you are just starting out with search engine marketing or you have been involved with it for years, you need to realize that not everything you read is true. Separating truth from speculation is something that will take time, your own testing, plenty of reading and getting to know other people in the industry. Just because you read something on a forum or a blog, does not mean it is always true. Some people do not look much further past what they have read. Instead they start making changes to there site or marketing campaign based on a single discussion in hopes of it working. Later to find out that it did more harm then good for them. Before making any major changes, participate in the discussion to ask further questions. You need to fully understand what the topic is at hand, realize the good and bad from it. Try and dissect the theory behind what is being talked about before trying to utilize it for your self. By doing this you will not only have a better understanding of what it is you are trying to do, you will be educating yourself further on the subject for future reference. By referencing back to it in the future, you can then start to come up with your own ideas for your marketing efforts.
Realize that in many cases what you read is not the entire story; it is nothing more then a bit of information to start with. Some parts could have been left out on purpose in an effort for that person to have there 15 minutes of fame. What they left out though was probably what makes the technique effective. In some cases what you read is a flat out lie in an effort to deceive people into thinking it really works. It sucks to have to read that last sentence, but it is true. Some search engine marketers will say whatever they think sounds good to throw other people off and even harm there rankings. That is why it is important to follow up more before implementing it to your website.
After spending a good amount of time at your favorite forums, you should be able to tell the good people from the ones that are full of crap. These are the people that you can, for the most part, trust in what they say. Get in contact with them, introduce yourself, and even try and help them out if you can. If you scratch there back, they will scratch yours. The search engine marketing industry does have some really helpful people in it; you just have to find them.
Here is a short list of people and there websites that I trust on what they say. This list could be much longer, but I am just going with a quick 15 to start. Some on the list are household names in the search industry. Even though I have never met them, what I have read by them along with there reputation is why they are on the list. You can read them on your own and discover other marketing methods that can help you.
Danny Sullivan
Barry Swartz
Andy Beard
Sebastian
Jill Whalen
Marty Weintraub (AimClear)
Jaan Kanellis (Incrediblehelp)
Michael Gray (Graywolf)
Rand Fishkin
Bill Slawski
Donna Fontenot (Dazzlin Donna)
Tamar Weinberg
Aaron Wall
Ruck
Lisa Barone
One thing you have to realize is there are circle’s of friends in this industry that help each other out. In these circle’s there are techniques that each of them use that they hardly tell anyone. In the end improving your SERP’s is a competition, so if you have found something that is really helping out, chances are you are not going to share it right away.
I hope you come to understand the difference between truth and speculation in this industry. You will find the truth by exploring, researching, and participating more on what it is you have read. You then can determine if the technique is worth the time and effort and how it COULD help or hurt you.
This can be compared to a drag race, where what you have read tells you how to run a 9 second ¼ mile time. “Just increase the boost of your turbo, increase the fuel flow and use nitrous”. Ok great, you just increased the boost to 22lbs. (22 was a good number to use I guess since I didn’t bother to research what effect it has), increased the fuel flow by over ½ and I will use nitrous right at the start and not let off until I reach the finish line in 9 seconds. After reading about it for the first time, implementing into your car you head down to the track. Your up next and start to shake in anticipation…will what I read really work for me…I can’t wait! The light turns greet, you drop the clutch and hit stage 1 of your nitrous and your…oh shit……BOOOOOMMMMM! You then realize that your fuel management system was turned up to high, thus flooding the car at the start and by hitting the nitrous you just shot your pistons out the side of your fender.
See what can happen when you speculate on something that was supposed to work. I guess next time you might look a little deeper into the source of your information.














January 2nd, 2008 at 12:54 am
Hi Steve,
Great analogy. I’d definitely recommend that anyone taking ideas from what they find on a blog or in a forum test that information, research it, explore it, and try to understand it as well as possible before relying upon it too much.
If your car is going to blow up, you want it to do that during a test run, and not during the race itself.
January 2nd, 2008 at 5:54 am
That’s really good advice, and thanks for the mention.
I can’t count the sites I saw where the webmaster has fucked up nearly everything based on crappy advice from SEO forums and copycat blogs.
January 2nd, 2008 at 8:25 am
I think this is one of the major problem’s people suffer from and why some SEO’s get a bad rap. They give certain advice to the public, but people do not do there own research to see how they can use it for there site. In this business everything is not handed to you on a silver spoon, and people expect it to be. Then you have the copycat’s who post some outrageous claim or technique that is so far from the truth. When someone tries it out and it fails beyond belief, they claim that SEO is bullshit and we are all in it just to screw people over. I just wish sometimes that people would think a little more before going fourth with something they read and expecting it to be the miracle cure for there marketing campaign.
January 2nd, 2008 at 5:57 pm
At least readers of SEMSpot won’t have to worry, you’re dead on the issue here and, hopefully, more SEOs will begin to quit spitting speculated ideas. Or, at least, give a warning before making a speculation about SEM or SEO.
January 2nd, 2008 at 6:29 pm
[…] Why Deciphering The Truth From Speculation In SEM/SEO Is Important, SEM Spot […]
January 2nd, 2008 at 8:00 pm
Thank you for the link and mention. We are grateful.
January 3rd, 2008 at 7:51 pm
[…] Why Deciphering The Truth From Speculation In SEM/SEO Is Important, SEM Spot […]
January 4th, 2008 at 12:49 am
That was spot on mate. Good choice of mentors by the way. SEO is as much an art as it is a science and differing opinions abound even among the elite. I guess you could say “reader beware” when it comes to seo advice.
January 4th, 2008 at 1:02 am
Thank you Dave, and no question on that one, everyone should beware on what they read on the internet no matter what it is about.
@Marty - Well deserved man, I am sure many agree with me on that.
January 4th, 2008 at 1:44 am
Thanks for the mention. Tough to find out who you can rely on if your just an average Joe and spot a poorly written article in USA today or the WSJ talking about SEO is broad sweeping generalities. Or if you bump into some garbage post from 1999 telling us how meta tag keywords are very important for SEO. Best thing to do is hang at your fav forum or blog and get comfortable with a few mods and SEO writers.
January 9th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
[…] not only talking about your very much appreciated kind mentions1 on your blogs. What gets my lazy butt out of my bed to write more […]